KILLING VINCENT:
THE MAN, THE MYTH, AND THE MURDER
Killing Vincent, proved forensically that it was not possible for Vincent to inflict his mortal wound. If Vincent did not shoot himself in the belly (of all places), then whoever put that penetrating wound in his abdomen, murdered him!
reviews
"…Suspicions of foul play now abound in Arenberg’s historical investigation of van Gogh’s last 70 days in Auvers sur-Oise, France. Anyone interested in truth, accuracy, history, justice, romance, and art rather than blasphemy should know all the details in this provocative controversy and draw their own conclusions.”
Timothy J. Standring
Curator, Denver Art Museum and author of "Becoming Van Gogh"
“...the first book to stop beating around the bush and actually scream “Murder” on its cover. He cuts through the hokum surrounding the suicide, examines the complicated forensics of the cold case, demonstrates why a self-inflicted gunshot wound could not possibly have happened and examines the various possibilities for whodunit...”
William Arnold
Investigative Reporter and host of “www.mysteryinauvers.com”
“The author meticulously examines the case for suicide and accident, attempting to show the ways in which the record has been misinformed, misinterpreted, or ignored. He then chases down the various suspects who might have been involved, landing finally on those whom he believes actually killed the man, offering their reasons for doing so and the ways in which they were able to keep the truth from the public...prose is exact and exciting...’”
Kirkus Reviews
